« Competing against Skype 103: Patent War | Main | Skype and The Enterprise »

Competing against Skype 104: Value Chain Denial

Do you think Skype is a threat to incumbent telcos?

This is the second in a series outlining tactics telcos have at their disposal to answer the question "If you think Skype is a threat to your telecom profits, how can you compete?"

101: Pricing
102: Lobbying
103: Patent War

Tie-Up Key Suppliers.
A business ecosystem attack.

Banana Split: The Value Chain in the conventional banana market

Skype needs partners to make its back-end business work. A large competitor might threaten to remove their business (or threaten to enter the market directly) if a Skype supplier continues to do business with Skype or offer Skype favorable/reasonable terms.

For example, Skype's SkypeIn and SkypeOut rely on call termination service providers to touch the public telephone network. Skype also relies on router manufacturers. Some of their suppliers: Colt Telecom, Level3, iBasis, Teleglobe, Cable and Wireless, B3G Telecom, TDC Song, Mblox, mobile365.

This is a subtle attack. Stifling Skype's value chain will only show up when negotiations with partners go badly for no apparent reason. Terms become unreasonable, higher quality of service no longer available, phone calls not returned. This attack relies on Skype not being sufficiently diversified in each market and in some markets dominated by large players.

A successful attack could hurt Skype's product quality, increase operations costs, and slow Skype's build-out to meet growth.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://skypejournal.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/3525

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Brought to you by:

Emerging Communications Conference

Auto generated tags