« A New Era Coming for Blackberry | Main | VON Conferences: RIP? »

What's Next In IP Communications? Not This Play

Andy Abramson at VoIP Watch has attempted to respond to last week's two stories that created a lot of buzz:

Andy, in his post, What's Next In IP Communications? Here's An Idea To Look At, is simply that -- an idea that, in business practice, just won't happen.

Instead of simply being another voice play to battle Skype or the mobile operators, the WiMax companies and the cable operators, and heck, even Ma Telco may all may find that they may be better off looking in another direction.

That direction is real-time video communications bundled up along with other IP related services like voice and text, all in one neat little package.

Why video when selling voice to their already installed user base is already there for the cable guys?

Because it is different.

In essence video is the next level of real-time communications to be nurtured and embraced, not only because its ready now, but because it also gives the WiMax, Telco and cable players a very different value proposition to offer and lead off with.

Too many players, too many egos, too many "ifs" and too much agreement required. And video communications really has no proprietary technology beyond normal technology licensing. Rogers launched the first North American video calling plan last week with its Rogers Vision package (which can be bundled up with voice and text) along with its launch for support of the Nokia N95 8GB. It's about who has access to the customer base; who can handle the billing readily. (I could almost see another Vonage scenario where Sprint/Clearwire would have to go out and find a critical mass of customers, incurring huge marketing costs.)

Alec Saunders says, Me Different, Not Really:

No, to really really change the game would require a leap of imagination that I don’t think Clearwire / Sprint possesses. WiMax is symmetrical high speed. Imagine a pure peer sharing network instead. Something like the TerraNet system — Skype style p2p for communications, and bittorrent style p2p for content distribution. Mesh it so you don’t have to build out a massive infrastructure. Price the whole thing at a flat rate for access only, and sit back and watch the destruction of 125 years of legacy telecom.

Sorry, Andy ... it's not a play that's going to be executed. Just look at Novell's failed attempt to create a standard UNIX consortium back in the mid-90's. Somehow a virally adopted operating system called Linux got in the way -- and it did not need "big players" to sow the seeds. Yet today Linux (and Open Source software) has become one of IBM's key resources for many of its offerings. Think of Skype's technology and ecosystem as the "Linux" of the real time communications world.

Update: Jon Arnold has just piped in with his: Skype-O Killer... que'st que c'est... He starts off with:

I can't seem to face up to the facts,
I'm tense and nervous and I can't relax...

Recognize the lyrics? Of course you do. But if you don't, it's from Psycho Killer, an early tune from one of my fave bands, the Talking Heads.

Like the title of my post? Clever, huh? Starts making even more sense when you start with the lyrics (did you pick up that other subtle Heads innuendo?). Those first two lines say it all for me when it comes to this Skype-killer storyline that started early last week with Om Malik's post.

Sorry, Jon. ... As for SIP as the common denominator for the telcos to make a play, just keep in mind that Skype is one of the world's largest users of SIP -- for its SkypeIn and SkypeOut services. They understand the technology, the protocol and where it can play a role; they can turn up the "volume" when it's appropriate in a "real time conversation" market context. Just because the technology and protocols are there does not a business make. (Skype's GM for Audio and Video was involved in the early evolution of SIP during five years spent at Microsoft. He recalls what the dream was and what today's reality is for SIP.)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Powered by Qumana

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://skypejournal.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/4009

Comments

The only way Telco's would have a chance at replicating a Skype-like service and be able to work together would be to fund a 'start-up' that operates independently of all of them and give that startup unfettered access to there collective networks. I agree with you Jim, the chances of this happening are slim to none (personally it would be a lot of fun to try and I would jump at the chance)

If someone wants to beat Skype, they have to be better than Skype. No one has come close yet, despite 5 years of trying (ooVoo is pretty good, Gizmo, Sightspeed not too bad - but they lack the attention to detail and User experience that Skype has)

Is Skype vulnerable? Absolutely, they have set the bar quite high with what is expected but have really dropped the ball in 2 key areas. Business and enhanced services - they have been so completely focussed on 'making HD and cheap calls' they have let there Voicemail service to pasture, it is unchanged since it launched, they have tinkered in the business market with less than 'pretty' results, and it is probably there biggest growth area.

Non-Telco thinking built Skype, I am not sure Telco thinking can replicate it. There is a happy medium somewhere, but who is willing to write the funding cheque and take the chance?

I think your comment at the top of this piece is the most relevant Jim. Everybody knows that the technology exists to execute this play. But the egos in play are never going to allow it to happen.

Thanks Jim. I agree with you to a point. Sure, Skype can use SIP, but they're not able to federate with other like providers, at least the way I'm suggesting - Andy too. I didn't say they will do that, but at least they can, and that's where Peter's article comes in - just trying to show what's possible without focusing on taking Skype down.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Brought to you by:

Convenos_125x125.active.gif

Auto generated tags